WEATHER ALERTS:

View All

Despite digital technology, photos often not taken at crash scenes with serious injuries

Frank Edwards motorcycle wreck_20110725085319_JPG

On Labor Day of 2009, Frank Edwards was riding his motorcycle when he collided with this car on Highway 86 near Eagle Rock, Mo.
Copyright 2011 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Frank Edwards wreck_20110725085622_JPG

Frank Edwards and his wife, Cindy, returned to the intersection where he nearly lost his life in a motorcycle wreck. Edwards is upset that the state trooper who investigated the crash did not take photos.
Photographer: Andy Pollard
Copyright 2011 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

advertisement

Posted: 07/25/2011

EAGLE ROCK, Missouri - Despite technological advances in taking and storing digital images, an NBC Action News investigation found there are many cases when state law enforcement agencies do not collect photographic evidence at serious vehicle crash scenes.

Based on numerous interviews with state highway patrols in the region, there are a number of safety, financial and time-related reasons why photos are not taken, even in crashes with serious injuries or fatalities. Department polices and resources also vary widely from state to state.

The lack of photographic evidence can be frustrating for people involved in crashes as they deal with insurance settlements and personal injury civil cases.
 

Life-threatening wreck, no photo evidence

On Labor Day morning of 2009, Frank Edwards and his wife, Cindy, hit the road on their motorcycles. They were heading back to the Kansas City area after a holiday weekend journey to Eureka Springs, Ark.

As they traveled on Highway 86 near Eagle Rock, Mo., the fog grew thick and began to affect visibility. Cindy radioed to her husband that they should pull off the road and wait for the fog to lift.

As she turned into a convenience store, Cindy waited for Frank to pull up alongside her. Instead, she heard a sickening collision.

“I saw him lying in the middle of the road and just started screaming,” Cindy said. “I was just praying that he was still alive.”

A 21-year-old driver had slammed his car into Frank as he began a left turn into the parking lot. The driver lost control after the impact and the car careened into a ditch. Frank’s bike flew back down the road and skidded into a truck.

Frank landed in the middle of the highway, the bones in his leg and arm shattered from the collision.

First responders arrived and rushed him away in an ambulance. He was later airlifted to a Springfield hospital.

“I woke up in intensive care two days later and said, ‘Where am I?’ Nobody could believe I was alive,” Frank said.
 

Accident report leaves questions

The Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) trooper who responded to the scene noted heavy fog in the accident report. Under the contributing circumstances section, he marked the 21-year-old driver for going “too fast for conditions.” He checked Frank for “failure to yield.”

The narrative summary had a brief statement from the Edwardses, the other driver and Victor Hammond, who was driving his truck when the motorcycle skidded into his front bumper and headlight.

“I thought it killed him,” Hammond told NBC Action News. “The car was speeding and didn’t have its lights on. Frank and his wife weren’t doing a damn thing wrong.”

But Hammond’s witness statement in the report did not mention any of that. There was also no witness statement from Cindy or even a mention that she was at the scene.

The witness statement attributed to Frank read, “I was just riding along.” Frank said he has no recollection of speaking with the trooper at the scene.

However, the thing that angered the veteran motorcyclist the most was there were no photos taken by the trooper at the scene.

“They almost had to strap me down to the hospital bed. I was ticked,” Frank said. “I assumed the first thing anyone did at the scene of a wreck is take pictures. I was relying on the experts to tell me what happened and I was told nothing.”

The only photos Frank ever saw are those taken by a friend who returned to the location several days later. The friend snapped photos of the damaged car, still sitting in the ditch, along with pictures of the motorcycle after it had been towed to a garage.
 

What is the policy for taking photos at crash scenes?

NBC Action News obtained the MSHP policy that details how troopers are expected to investigate wrecks .

The policy states that photographs should be taken “when appropriate.” The only guarantee photos will be taken is when more detailed investigations are ordered.

For instance, a technical accident investigation or reconstruction occurs when it appears likely felony charges will result from the crash, like a DWI arrest.

In some circumstances, the Major Crash Investigation Unit is called to the scene. That usually happens when a school bus, patrol vehicle or commercial vehicle is involved, or when there are more than three fatalities.

Otherwise, much of the discretion is left up to the trooper who responds to the crash scene.

“The system in place could not handle taking photos at every crash. In an ideal world, it would be great. But in reality, it’s not possible,” said Lieutenant John Hotz, assistant director of the Public Information and Education Division at MSHP headquarters in Jefferson City.

Hotz cited a number of reasons why photos might not be taken at wrecks with serious injuries or a fatality. Because of large coverage responsibilities in rural areas, troopers may have to respond to other crash scenes. Inclement weather also could make it dangerous to take photos on high-speed roadways.

Until recently, troopers were not even equipped

with individual cameras. Sometimes, there was only one available for each of the state’s nine troop areas.

According to Hotz, the MSHP is in the process of getting a digital camera in the hands of more than 1,100 troopers, an overhaul that should be complete by the end of the year.

In fact, the MSHP amended its policy last year to say, “Members who are assigned digital cameras should take photographs at all fatality accidents.”
 

Would photos speed up civil cases?

Frank Edwards said he has been riding a motorcycle for more than 25 years and 250,000 miles. The Labor Day near-death experience was the first wreck of his life.

After a grueling rehab process, Edwards returned to his mechanic job at Perkin’s Auto Service in Kansas City. He is also riding his motorcycle again. But his life has permanently changed.

There are three metal rods in his right leg and another one in his right forearm. It took a year before he could walk under his own power.

Despite the health improvement, the aftermath of the crash has left him financially wrecked. Frank said he did not have medical insurance at the time of the crash because he was searching for an affordable plan.

His treatment created more than $100,000 of medical bills, which he said forced him to declare Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Just to recoup some money for those bills, he hired an attorney to represent him in a personal injury case. Almost two years later, that civil case is still unresolved. He believes photographic evidence would have brought a speedier resolution and less of a battle with insurance companies.

“Even in very serious accidents, often times, the highway patrol doesn’t take photos,” said Brendan Buckley, an attorney with Edelman & Thompson, LLC, who is representing Edwards in the personal injury case. “Given the limited time and expense associated with taking the photos, it doesn’t make much sense.”

On July 21, Frank and Cindy Edwards returned to the scene of the crash with NBC Action News.

Standing near the intersection, Edwards said he is not angry with the driver and feels grateful for the quick response from emergency workers. But he is still baffled about why the trooper decided to not snap photos of his life-threatening crash.

“There are just so many unanswered questions that pictures would have solved,” Frank said. “I hate to think it was just because I was a motorcyclist and wasn’t important enough, but that is the impression I get.”
 

Photos at crash scenes vary by state

NBC Action News contacted several other state highway patrols in the region about their photo policies.

Officials in Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa all said they would expect photos be taken at any multi-vehicle crash with serious injuries.

In Kansas and Nebraska, all the troopers have digital cameras. In Iowa, Captain Curt Henderson said all officers are issued cameras, but they still use 35mm film.

“We try to indoctrinate our personnel that the investigation they do will have a long-term impact on any civil or criminal case,” said Henderson. “When someone nearly loses a life, there are going to be questions about what happened.”

A spokesperson with the Highway Patrol Division of the Arkansas State Police said all troopers have digital cameras. However, photos are left up to trooper discretion and nothing is mandated by policy.

In Illinois, spokesman Sgt. Juan Valenzuela said none of the troopers have cameras. Photos would only be taken when a technical accident reconstruction is ordered or if a trooper decides to use a personal camera.
 

MSHP crash investigation numbers

• 33,280 crash investigations in 2010
• 121 crash reconstructions by the Major Crash Investigation Unit
• 74 technical crash investigations
 

Ryan Kath can be reached at kath@nbcactionnews.com. You can also follow him on Twitter or Facebook .

Copyright 2011 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  • Comments
advertisement

Investigators


  1. Will infamous TV pitchman go to prison?

    Will infamous TV pitchman go to prison?

    An infamous TV pitchman is expected to appear in a Chicago courtroom Tuesday as the Federal Trade Commission fights to have him thrown in prison for nonpayment of a multi-million dollar fine.

  2. DDS: 4-year-old's death prompts firings

  3. AG sues contractor over Joplin homes

  • Stay Connected

Send us a News Tip.

Send us a News Tip.

Send us a News Tip.
Twitter

Send us a News Tip.
Facebook - 41 Action News

Send us a News Tip.
Facebook - 38 the Spot!

Send us a News Tip.
Community Calendar